An Air Force colonel retaliated against an Army major for speaking out to Congress and a Department of Defense watchdog about the contamination fallout from the 2021 Red Hill fuel leak that tainted drinking water in Hawaii, a new report details.
The 25-page report said that investigators substantiated an allegation that an Air Force colonel had retaliated against Army Maj. Amanda Feindt after she had meetings with members of Congress about the Red Hill contamination and pressured her not to continue communication.
The colonel described his dissatisfaction with Feindt during a February 2022 conversation, she said. At that point, some water pipes had been flushed in on-base housing, but Feindt continued living in a hotel because many homes were still not deemed safe to live in. Feindt filed a complaint to DoD watchdogs days later.
Read Next: Army Dramatically Expands Combat Patch Eligibility
“We found that the colonel’s rank and position of authority coupled with the colonel’s display of a dismissive attitude and demeanor toward the complainant’s concerns contributed to the likelihood that the colonel’s conduct would restrict a reasonable service member from continuing to lawful communicate with a member of Congress or an inspector general,” a summary of the report read.
The report was dated June 10 but was only recently shared with Feindt.
Roughly 93,000 residents on Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam in Hawaii were exposed to jet fuel after a pipe burst at Red Hill’s fuel tank farm around Thanksgiving 2021 and sent thousands of gallons of contaminants into a nearby well used for drinking water at the installation.
Feindt told Military.com in an interview that she felt vindicated, as the report said that her claims of retaliation were substantiated “by a preponderance of the evidence” and determined her story was “plausible and credible.” While she’s satisfied with the outcome, she’s also frustrated that the Air Force colonel in question is now retired, she said.
“It’s been a really heavy, hard, long road, and it’s been a really lonely one,” Feindt told Military.com.
Correspondence reviewed by Military.com identified the colonel as now-retired Col. Kenneth McAdams with U.S. Special Operations Command Pacific.
McAdams did not respond to multiple phone calls to numbers listed for him in public records or an email also identified as belonging to him by publication time. He also did not speak to investigators for the probe into his comments, the report detailed. A spokesperson for U.S. Special Operations Command did not return a request for comment by publication time either.
Weeks after the spill, and after she evacuated her family as they were experiencing medical symptoms, Feindt began contacting members and staffers on Capitol Hill to raise awareness of the ongoing issue.
In February, while on leave, she began meeting with multiple members of Congress. When she returned five days early from leave, she wasn’t allowed to sign back in to work from leave and was told “[he] wasn’t going to take me off leave.” During their meeting, she said the impression she got was that she was being retaliated against for speaking out.
“During the meeting, the colonel told the complainant that they had ‘brought it on [themselves]’ by talking to Congress, was acting like a ‘self-professed superhero,’ and should just drop their kids off at day care and return to work,” the summary detailed.
While the report “found no evidence” that the colonel’s comments stopped Feindt from contacting a member of Congress, it still was likely a violation of Title 10 Section 1034 of the U.S. Code, which prohibits “retaliatory personnel actions” for protected whistleblowing, investigators concluded.
Notably, the inspector general report made “no recommendations” of remedial action for Feindt, but said that the secretary of the Air Force should consider action against the colonel.
Feindt’s husband and two children were part of a successful lawsuit that blamed a number of health problems experienced by local residents on the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Facility spill. Two other similar legal cases are still pending in Hawaiian federal court, according to Just Well Law, the firm that represented Feindt’s family.
“My will to fight wasn’t ever about me,” Feindt told Military.com. “It really wasn’t even about my own family; it was about 93,000 people who were poisoned by an American military asset on American soil, and then they were treated like collateral damage, betrayed and left behind.”
Related: Military Families Win in Case over Fuel-Tainted Water from Red Hill Spill in Hawaii
Story Continues
Read the full article here