Listen to the article
0:00
0:00
Watch full video on YouTube
Kar98K vs G98 Classic German Mausers!
Watch full video on YouTube
28 Comments
The G98’s use in hunting is understandable, given its power and range, but what about the Kar98K, is it suitable for hunting larger game?
The Kar98K is definitely capable of taking down large game, but its 7.92x57mm cartridge may be overkill for smaller targets.
I’m curious about the process of restoring a Kar98K or G98 to its original condition, are there any notable challenges or considerations?
The video’s discussion of the Kar98K’s sniper variants is interesting, were these used extensively during World War II?
The Kar98K was indeed used as a sniper rifle, with some variants featuring a scope mount.
I’m skeptical about the video’s claim that the G98 is more durable than the Kar98K, can anyone provide evidence to support this?
I’d love to see a comparison between the Kar98K and other rifles of the same era, like the Lee-Enfield or the Mosin-Nagant.
The video’s discussion of the Kar98K’s military service is comprehensive, but what about its civilian use, were these rifles popular among sport shooters?
The Kar98K did gain popularity among sport shooters, particularly in the United States after World War II.
It’s interesting to note the differences in stock design between the two rifles, how do these affect their handling and ergonomics?
As a history buff, I appreciate the video’s attention to the rifles’ historical context, but I’d love to see more information on their development and design.
As a collector, I appreciate the attention to detail in the video, the Kar98K’s walnut stock is a beautiful piece of craftsmanship.
I’ve always been fascinated by the Mauser design, how did it influence later rifle designs like the M24 or the K98k?
The Mauser’s controlled-feed bolt action was a major innovation, adopted by many subsequent designs.
The video mentions the Kar98K’s use in World War II, but what about the G98, did it see any significant military service during this conflict?
The Kar98K’s role in World War I is well-documented, but what about its use in other conflicts, such as the Spanish Civil War?
The Kar98K saw limited use in the Spanish Civil War, mostly by the Nationalist forces.
The comparison between the two rifles’ trigger mechanisms is enlightening, how do these affect their accuracy and reliability?
The Kar98K’s trigger is often praised for its smoothness, while the G98’s is known for its crispness.
I’m curious about the historical context of these rifles, were they used in the same conflicts or did they serve different purposes?
The video mentions the Kar98K’s production numbers, but what about the G98, how many were manufactured during its production run?
The G98’s production numbers are less well-documented, but estimates suggest around 1.5 million were made.
The comparison between the Kar98K and G98 is intriguing, I’d love to see a side-by-side shooting test to really understand the differences in accuracy.
I’ve heard the Kar98K has a smoother bolt action, but the G98 has a more robust build.
The video mentions the Kar98K’s 7.92x57mm Mauser cartridge, I wonder how it compares to other cartridges of the time in terms of range and stopping power.
The 7.92x57mm was known for its penetration, but the British.303 was favored for its expansion.
As someone who’s handled both rifles, I can attest to the G98’s heavier weight, but is this a significant factor in its accuracy?
It’s surprising to see the G98’s popularity among hunters, given its military origins, what makes it so well-suited for hunting large game?