Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

Pentagon leaders say workers are using new agentic AI tools to compress weeks of work into hours. But the same tools are opening new frontiers of digital crime and changing the very nature of cybersecurity.

The rollout of agentic tools on the department’s GenAI.mil platform since December has been a “tremendous success,” Emil Michael, defense undersecretary for research and engineering, told reporters at the Pentagon on Tuesday. 

Michael said people were using the tools to do “the mundane part of their job” and take a “two-week task and compress it down to three hours.”

The platform recently added Google’s Gemini and is looking for more such.

We’re “trying to have options so we’re not single-threaded on any one vendor, and each of these models is trained in a somewhat different way on different data. So we’re going to learn which ones are more capable on which dimensions,” he said.

In its quest for AI tools that can help find vulnerabilities, the Pentagon is even evaluating Mythos, a powerful agentic model made by Anthropic—a company that has officially been labeled a national-security risk. Anthropic has sued the government over the designation. 

Michael said the government is in a “testing and evaluation period” with Mythos, which is already being used by agencies and a select group of large companies to find vulnerabilities. He tried to explain why the Pentagon was still using tools from a company that allegedly threatens national security, saying that Mythos is “a different product in some ways. Different probably than the company itself.”

What the Pentagon and the rest of the federal government must do now, Michael said, is “look at what this model can do, not only to the government software and hardware infrastructure, but to the private sector…for the rural hospitals, for the wastewater treatment plants, to all the things. So that we have the ability to patch them before adversaries get the same ability.”

When criminals use agentic AI

Michael said agent-based AI tools like Mythos, which can find and patch vulnerabilities without human oversight, will become more standard. 

“All the big tech companies now are using these cyber models to find vulnerabilities. They’re trying to make automatic patching using agents and using the same models. So we expect that to grow across the industry, across the government.” 

But that won’t be enough to protect against future AI-enabled attacks.

Jackson Reed, founder of AI startup Barding Defense, says that agentic tools will change cybersecurity in ways that many institutions don’t yet appreciate. 

“We’re going to see criminal groups look a lot more like state actors,” Reed said. 

What does that mean? Today, most cybercriminals ocus on fast-payoff attacks like stealing data or encrypting it for ransom. But soon, he said, they will mimic some state-backed Chinese and Russian groups by trying to stay in a network to spy, move “laterally,” or manipulate data.

“Changes in attacker skill are going to produce entire new taxonomies of attack (like the industrialized insider trading example, or industry-wide ransomware deployments) that will pose risks to society and raise questions about the feasibility of current constitutional approaches,” Reed said in a followup email.

That will create business models for cyber criminals and states such as Russia that routinely work with those criminal groups. Reed said using AI to automatically detect and patch software holes won’t protect against that. For instance, Opus 4.6, Anthropic’s latest model for coding and reasoning, can find and fix software vulnerabilities but it misses things like lateral movement, he says.

Reed is working with Breakpoint Labs, a cybersecurity company that works with the U.S. military, to develop  a new sort of agent platform to help cybersecurity professionals find the new kinds of attacks that agentic AI tools enable but can’t spot.



Read the full article here

Share.

20 Comments

  1. Amelia Taylor on

    The Pentagon’s use of agentic AI tools on the GenAI.mil platform has been a tremendous success, with workers able to compress weeks of work into hours, according to Emil Michael, defense undersecretary for research and engineering.

    • Oliver Martinez on

      This is a significant improvement in efficiency, but what are the potential risks associated with relying on these tools?

  2. Olivia Martin on

    I’m skeptical about the idea that using agentic AI tools will be enough to protect against future AI-enabled attacks, and we need to consider a more comprehensive approach to cybersecurity.

    • William Q. Garcia on

      This is a valid concern, and we need to think about how to combine these tools with other security measures to create a robust defense system.

  3. Mary Jackson on

    Jackson Reed, founder of AI startup Barding Defense, warns that agentic tools will change cybersecurity in ways that many institutions don’t yet appreciate, and we need to be prepared for these changes.

    • Isabella Smith on

      Reed’s statement that criminal groups will start to look like state actors is particularly alarming, and we need to consider how to address this new threat landscape.

  4. Noah X. Lopez on

    The use of agentic AI tools like Mythos to find and patch vulnerabilities without human oversight will become more standard, and this could have significant implications for cybersecurity.

  5. John Thomas on

    The use of agentic AI tools by criminal groups to mimic state-backed Chinese and Russian groups by trying to stay in a network to spy, move laterally, or manipulate data is a concerning development.

    • Jennifer Taylor on

      This is a new frontier of digital crime, and we need to think about how to address this threat and protect our networks and data.

  6. John Taylor on

    The rollout of agentic tools on the GenAI.mil platform since December has been successful, but we need to consider the potential long-term implications of relying on these tools.

  7. Olivia Z. Johnson on

    The addition of Google’s Gemini to the GenAI.mil platform is a step towards having options and not being single-threaded on any one vendor, as each model is trained in a somewhat different way on different data.

  8. Robert Lopez on

    The fact that big tech companies are already using cyber models to find vulnerabilities and make automatic patching using agents and the same models is a significant development in the field of cybersecurity.

  9. Isabella Johnson on

    It’s concerning that the Pentagon is evaluating Mythos, a powerful agentic model made by Anthropic, a company labeled a national-security risk, and I wonder what safeguards are in place to mitigate this risk.

    • Lucas T. Taylor on

      Emil Michael noted that Mythos is a different product from the company itself, but this distinction may not be enough to alleviate concerns.

  10. Robert Davis on

    The addition of new agentic models to the GenAI.mil platform, such as Mythos, is a significant development in the field of cybersecurity, and we need to consider how to use these tools effectively.

    • Jennifer Jones on

      The key is to use these tools in a way that complements human judgment and oversight, rather than replacing it.

  11. Elizabeth Thomas on

    The testing and evaluation period for Mythos is an opportunity for the government to assess the potential risks and benefits of using this tool, and to consider how to mitigate any potential risks.

  12. Patricia Lopez on

    The fact that Anthropic has sued the government over the national-security risk designation raises questions about the company’s motivations and the potential risks associated with using their tools.

    • Linda J. Rodriguez on

      This legal action may be a sign of a larger issue, and we need to consider the potential implications of using tools from a company with a questionable track record.

  13. Patricia Lopez on

    The Pentagon’s goal of looking at what the Mythos model can do to the government software and hardware infrastructure, as well as the private sector, is a crucial step in understanding the potential risks and benefits of these tools.

Leave A Reply

© 2026 Gun Range Day. All Rights Reserved.