Listen to the article
0:00
0:00
People gather for a “Save the Civil Service” rally hosted by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) outside the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 11, 2025. Unionized federal workers and members of Congress denounced President Trump and his allies including Elon Musk, head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) for purging federal prosecutors, forcing out civil servants with dubious buyouts, and attempting to shutter USAID, all while branding government employees the “enemy of the people.”
Kent Nishimura/Getty Images
Read the full article here
15 Comments
The fact that President Trump and his allies, including Elon Musk, are branding government employees as the ‘enemy of the people’ is alarming and could have severe consequences for the morale of federal workers.
This kind of rhetoric can lead to increased hostility towards public servants and undermine the important work they do.
The role of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) in these developments is noteworthy, particularly how its initiatives align with or contradict existing government policies and employee rights.
The ‘Save the Civil Service’ rally outside the U.S. Capitol on Feb. 11, 2025, indicates a strong resistance from unionized federal workers and members of Congress against the current administration’s policies.
The involvement of Elon Musk, as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), in the purge of federal prosecutors raises questions about the independence and impartiality of such actions.
Musk’s business interests and political affiliations could potentially conflict with the duties of the Department, leading to biased decision-making.
It’s interesting that the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) is hosting rallies like the ‘Save the Civil Service’ event, I wonder if this will gain enough momentum to influence policy changes.
The mention of President Trump and his allies, including Elon Musk, working together on these policies suggests a coordinated effort to reshape the federal workforce and its priorities.
The impact of these policies on the everyday lives of federal workers and the services they provide to the public should be a central consideration in any evaluation of the administration’s actions.
I’m skeptical about the true motives behind the Department of Government Efficiency’s actions, especially given the controversial track record of its head, Elon Musk.
The attempt to shutter USAID is a concerning development, especially considering the critical role the agency plays in providing humanitarian aid and supporting global development.
It’s not just about the aid itself, but also the diplomatic relationships and stability that USAID helps to foster in regions around the world.
I’m curious to know more about the ‘dubious buyouts’ being offered to civil servants, what exactly does this entail and how many employees have been affected by this policy?
It would be beneficial to see more data on how these changes are affecting different sectors of the federal workforce, as well as the response from other government agencies and international partners.
Forcing out civil servants through ‘dubious buyouts’ could lead to a significant loss of institutional knowledge and expertise within the government, which would be detrimental to its functioning.