Listen to the article
0:00
0:00
Watch full video on YouTube
He Shot 3 Armed Robbers and Was Charged with MURDER!
Watch full video on YouTube
18 Comments
I think the man’s decision to shoot the robbers was a last resort, and he should not be charged with murder.
The fact that the man shot 3 armed robbers and was still charged with murder raises questions about the justice system’s handling of self-defense cases.
The charge of murder seems excessive, especially considering the robbers were armed and posed a threat to the man’s life.
The fact that the man was charged with murder after shooting 3 armed robbers is a clear example of how the justice system can fail to protect its citizens.
It’s not that simple, we need to consider all the facts before making a judgment.
I’m curious to know more about the circumstances surrounding the shooting, was it a home invasion or a public place?
According to the video, it happened at a convenience store, the owner was just trying to protect himself.
I think the prosecution should reconsider the charges against the man, given the circumstances of the case.
The fact that the robbers were armed and the man was not, raises questions about the imbalance of power in this situation.
It’s surprising that the video of the incident is available on YouTube, I wonder if it will be used as evidence in the trial.
I’m skeptical about the prosecution’s decision to charge the man with murder, it seems like a clear case of self-defense.
I’ve seen the full video on YouTube and I think the man’s actions were justified, the robbers were a clear threat to his safety.
This incident raises concerns about the safety of business owners and their right to defend themselves against armed robbery.
This incident highlights the importance of having a clear understanding of self-defense laws and how they apply in different situations.
The man’s actions, although extreme, were likely driven by a desire to protect himself and his property from harm.
This case highlights the need for clearer self-defense laws to protect individuals who are forced to defend themselves against armed attackers.
The man’s case has sparked a lot of debate about the limits of self-defense and when it’s justified to use lethal force.
It’s a difficult question, but ultimately it comes down to whether the man’s life was in imminent danger.