The fact that they can be fired for something as simple as not following protocol is a testament to the high level of discipline required to be an SAS operator.
I’ve heard that the SAS has a very low tolerance for mistakes, which is understandable given the nature of their work, but it’s still surprising to see it in action.
It’s not just about the individual operator, it’s about the team’s overall performance and safety, so if someone is not pulling their weight, they have to go.
I’m surprised that SAS operators can be fired for such simple reasons, it makes me wonder what kind of training they receive to prepare them for high-pressure situations.
19 Comments
I’m not sure I agree with the approach the SAS takes, it seems very harsh and unforgiving, but I suppose that’s what makes them so effective.
I’ve heard that the SAS has a very strong sense of camaraderie, but it’s also a very individualistic environment, which can be tough to navigate.
I’m curious to know more about the process of becoming an SAS operator, what kind of selection process do they have to go through?
It’s interesting to see how the SAS handles discipline, it’s definitely a unique approach compared to other military units.
Yes, and it’s not just about discipline, it’s also about maintaining the reputation of the SAS as an elite force.
The fact that they can be fired for something as simple as not following protocol is a testament to the high level of discipline required to be an SAS operator.
The SAS is not just a job, it’s a way of life, and if you’re not committed to that lifestyle, then you’re not going to make it.
I’ve heard that the SAS has a very low tolerance for mistakes, which is understandable given the nature of their work, but it’s still surprising to see it in action.
It’s not just about the individual operator, it’s about the team’s overall performance and safety, so if someone is not pulling their weight, they have to go.
That’s a good point, but it’s also important to consider the human factor and the potential consequences of firing someone without proper support.
It’s surprising to see that the SAS has such a high turnover rate, I would have thought that once you’re in, you’re in for life.
Actually, the turnover rate is not that high, it’s just that the selection process is very rigorous, so only the best make it through.
The SAS is known for its high standards, and if you’re not meeting those standards, then you’re not going to make the cut, it’s as simple as that.
I’ve always been fascinated by the SAS and their operations, it’s amazing to see the level of skill and dedication required to be a part of it.
The video on YouTube didn’t go into much detail about the specific reasons for the firings, I’d like to know more about what actually happened.
As a former military personnel, I can attest that the SAS is not a place for the faint of heart, and if you can’t hack it, then you’re out.
The fact that they can be let go for something as minor as not following protocol is concerning, it seems like a very strict environment to work in.
I’m surprised that SAS operators can be fired for such simple reasons, it makes me wonder what kind of training they receive to prepare them for high-pressure situations.
The training is rigorous, but sometimes it’s not enough to prepare them for the unexpected, which can lead to mistakes.