It’s surprising that a company could survive for so long without innovating, I’d like to know more about their business model and how they managed to sustain themselves.
I’m curious to know if the company’s lack of innovation was a result of a lack of investment in research and development or if there were other factors at play.
I’ve seen similar cases where a lack of innovation has led to significant financial losses, it’s crucial for companies to prioritize research and development.
The concept of 100 years without innovation is mind-boggling, I’m eager to learn more about the company’s story and what lessons can be learned from their experience.
The video preview doesn’t give much away, but I’m intrigued by the possibility of learning from this company’s mistakes and applying those lessons to my own business.
It’s concerning to think about what could happen if a company or industry goes 100 years without innovating, the potential consequences are staggering.
It’s hard to imagine a company going 100 years without innovating, were there any attempts at innovation that failed or were there external factors at play?
The lack of innovation over such a long period is a significant concern, it highlights the importance of staying ahead of the curve and adapting to changing market conditions.
Going 100 years without innovation is a clear indication that something went terribly wrong, I hope the video provides some insight into what happened.
22 Comments
The video preview raises more questions than answers, I’m looking forward to watching the full video to learn more about this company’s story.
I’m skeptical about the claim of 100 years without innovation, were there any external factors that might have influenced this period of stagnation?
It’s surprising that a company could survive for so long without innovating, I’d like to know more about their business model and how they managed to sustain themselves.
I’m curious to know if the company’s lack of innovation was a result of a lack of investment in research and development or if there were other factors at play.
The fact that a company can go 100 years without innovating is a wake-up call for all businesses to prioritize innovation and stay ahead of the curve.
I’ve seen similar cases where a lack of innovation has led to significant financial losses, it’s crucial for companies to prioritize research and development.
The video preview mentions a full video on YouTube, I’m curious to see if it explores the role of leadership in preventing innovation.
The fact that they went 100 years without innovation is astonishing, I’d love to know what factors contributed to this stagnation.
The concept of 100 years without innovation is mind-boggling, I’m eager to learn more about the company’s story and what lessons can be learned from their experience.
The concept of 100 years without innovation raises questions about the company culture and values, were they too risk-averse or complacent?
Going 100 years without innovation is a significant concern, it highlights the importance of continuous improvement and adaptation in business.
I’d love to know more about the company’s history and what led to this period of stagnation, was it a result of internal or external factors?
Perhaps the video will explore the company’s history and provide some insight into what went wrong.
The video preview doesn’t give much away, but I’m intrigued by the possibility of learning from this company’s mistakes and applying those lessons to my own business.
It’s concerning to think about what could happen if a company or industry goes 100 years without innovating, the potential consequences are staggering.
Absolutely, it could lead to a loss of competitiveness and ultimately, the demise of the company.
The lack of innovation over such a long period is a clear indication of poor management and a lack of vision, it’s a lesson for all businesses.
It’s hard to imagine a company going 100 years without innovating, were there any attempts at innovation that failed or were there external factors at play?
Innovation is key to survival in today’s fast-paced world, it’s surprising that a company could go so long without adapting or evolving.
I agree, and it’s likely that the company’s customers suffered as a result of the lack of innovation.
The lack of innovation over such a long period is a significant concern, it highlights the importance of staying ahead of the curve and adapting to changing market conditions.
Going 100 years without innovation is a clear indication that something went terribly wrong, I hope the video provides some insight into what happened.