Listen to the article
For as long as I’ve been around, would-be suppressor owners faced two barriers to entry: the process and the tax stamp.
The process for legally purchasing a gun muffler was long and complicated, but the $200 tax stamp was, for many, the straw that broke the camel’s back. It was bad enough to drop $1000 on a suppressor and then wait a year to take it home-adding a $200 tax forced many to reconsider the endeavor entirely.
A lot has changed in the last few years. The ATF streamlined their approval process to make it quicker and more efficient, slashing wait times from months to just a few weeks. Then, in a move no one saw coming, Congress voted last year to cut the tax from $200 to $0.
If that new discount is making you consider buying a suppressor for the first time, you’ve come to the right place. The process can be intimidating for first-timers, but the benefits are tremendous. It’s more pleasant to shoot a rifle with a muffler on the end, especially the large calibers hunters tend to prefer. A suppressor will save your hearing, reduce recoil, and let you avoid fumbling around with hearing protection with a target animal in sight.
To help you make the best decision possible, we’ve compiled a complete suite of resources with advice about which suppressor to purchase, how to legally take it home, and then use it out in the field.
Read the full article here
19 Comments
The $200 tax stamp was a significant barrier for many would-be suppressor owners, so it’s great to see it’s now $0, making it more accessible to hunters like myself who want to protect their hearing and reduce recoil.
The article mentions that the ATF has slashed wait times from months to just a few weeks, but what about the actual processing time, how long does it take to receive the suppressor after submitting the application?
I’m curious to know more about the streamlined approval process implemented by the ATF, how has it reduced wait times from months to just a few weeks?
From what I’ve read, the ATF has implemented an online system that allows for faster submission and review of applications, resulting in significantly reduced wait times.
As someone who’s been waiting for the right time to purchase a suppressor, I’m excited to take advantage of the $0 tax stamp, and I’m looking forward to experiencing the benefits of reduced recoil and preserved hearing.
I’m concerned about the potential for misuse of suppressors, and I think it’s essential to emphasize the importance of responsible gun ownership and use, especially with the increased accessibility of suppressors.
The article mentions that the process can be intimidating for first-timers, I’d love to see a follow-up article with a step-by-step guide on how to legally purchase and use a suppressor.
As a hunter, I can attest to the importance of preserving one’s hearing, and a suppressor is a worthwhile investment, especially considering the benefits of reduced recoil and not having to fumble with hearing protection.
As someone who’s gone through the process of purchasing a suppressor before the tax stamp was waived, I can say that it’s a significant relief to see the changes, and I’m excited to see more people taking advantage of this opportunity.
I’m excited to see the impact of the $0 tax stamp on the hunting community, and I believe it will lead to more hunters prioritizing their hearing safety and reducing recoil, making for a more enjoyable hunting experience.
The article mentions that the benefits of using a suppressor include reducing recoil and saving one’s hearing, but what about the noise reduction, how effective are suppressors in reducing the sound of a gunshot?
As a long-time hunter, I’m thrilled to see the changes in the suppressor laws and regulations, and I believe it will have a positive impact on the hunting community, making it safer and more enjoyable for everyone involved.
The article highlights the importance of preserving one’s hearing, and I couldn’t agree more, as a hunter who’s experienced hearing loss due to prolonged exposure to gunfire, I can attest to the importance of taking precautions.
I’m skeptical about the impact of the $0 tax stamp on the demand for suppressors, do you think it will lead to an increase in sales and if so, how will manufacturers keep up with the demand?
It’s interesting to note that the article highlights the benefits of using a suppressor, including saving one’s hearing and reducing recoil, but what about the potential drawbacks, such as added weight and maintenance requirements?
I’ve been considering purchasing a suppressor for my rifle, and with the $0 tax stamp, it’s now a more viable option, but I’m concerned about the cost of the suppressor itself, which can range from $500 to $1000.
I’m curious to know more about the different types of suppressors available, and how they compare in terms of effectiveness, price, and durability, are there any recommendations for first-time buyers?
The $0 tax stamp is a significant development, and I believe it will lead to an increase in suppressor sales, which could potentially lead to more innovative products and technologies in the market.
For those considering purchasing a suppressor for the first time, I’d recommend doing thorough research on the different types and models available, as well as reading reviews from other users to find the best fit for their needs.