The video touches on the psychological impact of being shot, regardless of the caliber; this aspect deserves more discussion in the context of self-defense.
The video mentions a study that shows.380 has a higher stopping power in certain situations, but it’s still unclear how that translates to self-defense.
It would be interesting to see a comparison of the two calibers in terms of reliability in adverse conditions, such as extreme temperatures or after exposure to elements.
The video on YouTube mentions that.380 can be a better choice for concealed carry due to its smaller size, but what about the trade-offs in terms of range and accuracy?
23 Comments
The cost and availability of.380 ammunition compared to 9mm could be a deciding factor for many shooters, especially for practice and training.
I’ve had personal experience with both.380 and 9mm, and while.380 is easier to carry, 9mm feels more reassuring in a defensive scenario.
The video raises a good point about the importance of training with whatever caliber you choose, as proficiency is key to effective self-defense.
In the context of law enforcement, the choice between.380 and 9mm might depend on specific mission requirements and department policies.
The historical context of.380 and 9mm development is fascinating, with both having origins in early 20th-century Europe.
I’ve always been skeptical about the effectiveness of.380 in a self-defense situation, especially against multiple attackers.
The choice between.380 and 9mm might also depend on the shooter’s lifestyle, including how and where they plan to carry their firearm.
The legal implications of using.380 versus 9mm in a self-defense situation could vary by jurisdiction, which is an important consideration.
While.380 may have its advantages, the wider availability of 9mm ammunition and firearms might make it a more practical choice for many users.
For new shooters, the decision between.380 and 9mm might come down to the ease of use and manageability of the firearm.
The video highlights the importance of shot placement regardless of the caliber used, which is a crucial point often overlooked in these debates.
The video touches on the psychological impact of being shot, regardless of the caliber; this aspect deserves more discussion in the context of self-defense.
The comparison between.380 and 9mm is intriguing, but I’d like to know more about the stopping power of each caliber in real-life scenarios.
The video mentions a study that shows.380 has a higher stopping power in certain situations, but it’s still unclear how that translates to self-defense.
I’m curious about the ballistic differences between.380 and 9mm, specifically how they penetrate and expand upon impact.
It would be interesting to see a comparison of the two calibers in terms of reliability in adverse conditions, such as extreme temperatures or after exposure to elements.
For those with smaller hands,.380 might indeed be a better option due to the typically smaller grip size of.380 handguns.
The discussion on recoil and muzzle flip is important; how does.380 compare to 9mm in terms of shooter comfort and follow-up shots?
It’s surprising to hear that some experts prefer.380 over 9mm for home defense, citing less over-penetration as a key factor.
It’s mentioned that.380 has seen significant improvements in recent years, but how does its development compare to advancements in 9mm technology?
The video on YouTube mentions that.380 can be a better choice for concealed carry due to its smaller size, but what about the trade-offs in terms of range and accuracy?
Range and accuracy are compromised with.380, but the video argues that for close-quarters self-defense,.380 is sufficient.
In terms of accessories and aftermarket support, does.380 have as many options as 9mm for customization and enhancement?