Listen to the article
The late 1970s was an interesting era when it came to compact pistols. In the United States, the .45 ACP was king; 9 mm was something best left to Europeans. This was well before NRA helped pass the first Right-To-Carry law in Florida in 1987, and there was limited demand for concealable pistols—but there was some. To combine .45 ACP punch with a very compact pistol, inventor and manufacturer Philip R. Lichtman set up the Semmerling Corporation in Massachusetts.
The Semmerling LM-4 was the smallest .45 ACP handgun available to date. It was not a semi-automatic, but rather a manually operated pistol. This obviated the need for a slide to be cycled as well as a recoil spring—meaning less real estate was required.
Here’s how it works: The frame’s breech contains the fire-control and firing-pin assemblies, with the frame-mounted extractor being stationary. The barrel and chamber slide forward on rails cut into the frame, exposing the action port above the magazine. Pulling the barrel rearward strips a cartridge presented from the magazine into the chamber.
The Semmerling LM-4 received a three-quarter-page review in The American Rifleman in October 1978, before Lichtman’s patent—although applied for—was granted. The gun, serial number 126, was remarkably small. Its overall length was 5.31 inches, and its barrel length was 3.66 inches with a six-groove, right-hand twist.
Inside, squeezing the double-action-only trigger does two things: First, it rotates a tumbler that locks the barrel to the frame, and then its continued travel releases the firing pin to strike the primer of the chambered cartridge. Fully releasing the trigger unlocks the barrel assembly, allowing it to be pushed forward. As it moves, the expended case is held by the extractor until a projection on the left side of the barrel serving as the ejector kicks out the cartridge. The slide is then manually pulled rearward, stripping another round from the magazine. Until the trigger is actuated, the barrel is free to slide forward. When tested in 1978, there were two failures to feed with the muzzle elevated, but none when it was held horizontally, out of 200 rounds. NRA staffers could fire one round per second with this little straight-pull contraption. They wrote “Felt recoil was heavy.” That was a gunwriter code phrase for “extremely unpleasant.”
If you wanted to carry it with a round in the chamber, there was a barrel lock on the right side that if pushed upward, prevented the barrel and cartridge from sliding. But, to fire the gun in that condition, you had to slightly pull the trigger back to allow the lock to drop out of engagement, then you could fire the gun with a full trigger pull. Don’t try that at home.
At the top-right corner of the right-side stock is a small lever that needs to be engaged to carry the LM-4 with a round in the chamber • A beefy extractor makes sure empty cases are cleared during the manual ejection process • Holding four rounds of .45 ACP, the magazine gave the LM-4 the same total capacity as most small-frame revolvers • Unique in its manual operation, the barrel is slid forward by hand to remove the spent case, then pulled rearward to chamber the next round.
Field-stripping was moderately straightforward. Remove the barrel limit pin on the front of the frame, depress its detent, then slide the barrel off the frame. Even though the somewhat quirky manual gives detailed instructions on how to disassemble the LM-4 completely, it also cautioned “the strong striker-torsion spring may tend to pop out, flinging small parts around … . ”
Written right on the gun was an admonition to only use 230-grain, hardball ammunition. Apparently, you could shoot other loads, but it was designed to run with FMJs. The manual included some choice words that, perhaps, predicted the gun’s future: “Do not practice excessively with the LM-4 … Don’t risk breakage by over practicing.”
The Semmerling was heavy for its size, weighing in at 26.5 ounces unloaded; the thing was made of tool steel, after all. Here’s how Semmerling described its construction, circa 1981: “Every action is painstakingly hand fitted. Each gun is exhaustively tested. In fact, no gun is shipped until our president is personally satisfied with it. Maybe that’s why in four years we’ve been making LM-4s, not one has been returned.”
Not enough for you? “Every spring in the LM-4 is stress relieved. Every critical part is individually Rockwell tested. Every single frame and barrel is x-rayed and Magnafluxed multiple times. The result: a remarkably strong, trouble-free weapon that you can stake your life on.”
As much time and attention as went into essentially hand-making each one of these guns, they were predictably expensive. Suggested retail on the version tested in 1978 was $645. You could accessorize your LM-4 with cocobolo stocks, hard-chrome plating, extra magazines, spare parts, a holster and a magazine pouch. All of those things were for extra cost, of course. Realize a Smith & Wesson Model 29 .44 Mag. revolver in 1980 only cost $319.50—that’s right, the Semmerling cost twice as much as Dirty Harry’s revolver.
The “Blue Book of Gun Values” indicates the guns were made from 1977 until 1982 by Semmerling, and it is thought that it made somewhat less than 600 pistols. The LM-4 and other models were later made by the American Derringer Corp.
The world’s largest organic deposit of Semmerling pistols can be found at NRA’s National Firearms Museum. There are 22 of them on display, including just about every finish and variation, in a case entitled, rightly, “Weird and Wonderful.”
They got it half right.
Read the full article here

24 Comments
The Semmerling LM-4’s design and performance characteristics, such as its compact size and the ability to fire one round per second, make it an interesting study in the evolution of concealable pistols.
The process of loading and firing the Semmerling LM-4, involving the manual operation of the barrel and the double-action-only trigger, seems complex and might require some getting used to for potential users.
The complexity of the Semmerling LM-4’s operation could be a barrier for some users, but it might also appeal to those who value its unique design and compactness.
The fact that the Semmerling LM-4 was the smallest.45 ACP handgun available at the time of its introduction highlights the significance of its design in the context of firearms history.
The fact that the Semmerling LM-4 can fire one round per second, as demonstrated by NRA staffers, is impressive, especially given its unique straight-pull design.
I’m skeptical about the practicality of the Semmerling LM-4’s double-action-only trigger, which requires a full trigger pull to release the firing pin, considering the ‘heavy’ felt recoil mentioned in the 1978 test.
The heavy recoil might be due to the compact size and.45 ACP caliber, but it’s still worth considering for those who value concealability.
The Semmerling LM-4’s design, with the barrel and chamber sliding forward on rails, allows for a very compact overall length of 5.31 inches, making it suitable for concealed carry.
The barrel lock feature on the Semmerling LM-4, which prevents the barrel and cartridge from sliding when a round is chambered, seems like a useful safety mechanism, but the process to fire the gun in that condition sounds complicated.
The Semmerling LM-4’s unique design, with the frame-mounted extractor being stationary and the barrel serving as the ejector, is a testament to the innovative thinking of its inventor, Philip R. Lichtman.
The performance of the Semmerling LM-4, with no failures to feed when held horizontally and the ability to fire one round per second, suggests it could be effective in certain self-defense scenarios.
The effectiveness of the Semmerling LM-4 in self-defense would depend on various factors, including the user’s proficiency and the specific circumstances of the encounter.
The Semmerling LM-4’s compact size and unique mechanism make it an interesting piece of firearms history, reflecting the evolving demand for concealable pistols in the late 1970s and early 1980s.
The manually operated pistol mechanism of the Semmerling LM-4, where the barrel and chamber slide forward on rails cut into the frame, is a notable design choice, allowing for a more compact gun.
I’m concerned about the safety implications of the Semmerling LM-4’s barrel lock feature and the process required to fire the gun when a round is chambered, which seems potentially hazardous if not handled correctly.
The mention of ‘heavy’ felt recoil in the 1978 test of the Semmerling LM-4 is concerning, as it could affect the gun’s usability, especially for those not accustomed to.45 ACP pistols.
The Semmerling Corporation’s effort to create a compact.45 ACP pistol, as seen in the LM-4, was a response to the limited demand for concealable pistols before the first Right-To-Carry law in 1987.
I’m curious about the reliability of the Semmerling LM-4, given the two failures to feed with the muzzle elevated during the 1978 test, and how this might affect its performance in real-world scenarios.
The Semmerling LM-4’s manually operated design and compact size make it a notable example of innovation in firearms design, driven by the need for concealable pistols.
The fact that the Semmerling LM-4 received a three-quarter-page review in The American Rifleman in October 1978, before Philip R. Lichtman’s patent was granted, indicates significant interest in this compact pistol at the time.
The Semmerling LM-4’s magazine capacity of four rounds of.45 ACP is relatively small, but the gun’s compact size and unique design might make up for this limitation in certain situations.
The trade-off between magazine capacity and concealability is a common issue with compact pistols, and the Semmerling LM-4 is no exception.
It’s interesting to note that the Semmerling LM-4 was designed to combine.45 ACP punch with a very compact pistol, addressing the limited demand for concealable pistols in the late 1970s.
The Semmerling LM-4’s manually operated mechanism, which eliminates the need for a slide and recoil spring, is quite innovative, allowing for a more compact design with an overall length of 5.31 inches.