Listen to the article
Sweden and a number of other NATO nations announced plans to send troops, military aircraft, and ships to Greenland after a Wednesday discussion at the White House failed to change Trump administration officials’ desire to acquire the Danish territory.
The meeting between officials from Greenland, Denmark, and the United States that “did not succeed in changing the American position” on possible annexation, Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen said in Washington, D.C.
Danish Minister of Defense Troels Lund Poulsen warned during a separate press conference Wednesday that “security tensions have spread to the Arctic.”
“Therefore, in close dialogue with the Greenlandic government, we have agreed to increase our military presence and exercise activity in the Arctic and the North Atlantic in cooperation with NATO allies,” Poulsen said.
He told the Danish news outlet Berlingske that increased ships, planes, and soldiers would all be necessary, and the outlet reported that Denmark will send the army’s 1st Brigade.
Danish military officials declined to say which nations would contribute military capabilities.
Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson posted on X: “Several officers from the Swedish Armed Forces are arriving in Greenland today. They are part of a group from several allied countries. Together, they will prepare for upcoming elements within the framework of the Danish exercise Operation Arctic Endurance. It is at Denmark’s request that Sweden is sending personnel from the Armed Forces.”
Germany and France said Wednesday that they will also send troops, and the U.K. is considering doing the same, Le Monde reported. The U.K. has signaled a willingness to join the current effort, according to a Bloomberg report this week, and Norway’s prime minister has also made a statement of support.
Last September, all of these nations participated in Arctic Light, a military exercise intended to strengthen the operational readiness of the Danish Armed Forces and NATO in and around Greenland.
President Trump’s determination to acquire Greenland “one way or another” has mystified allies in Europe and experts in the United States. Virtually all sides agree on the strategic significance of Greenland, the need for increased NATO participation there, and the relative ease with which the United States could increase its military capability there under existing international agreements.
Ian Lesser, a distinguished fellow at the German Marshall Fund, told reporters on Tuesday that while the United States could easily stage a military takeover of the country, actually running it would be considerably more difficult, especially without European support.
“From an infrastructure perspective, I think that would be quite a challenge, and the value wouldn’t really align with the cost from the U.S. perspective,” Lesser said.
Sophie Arts, also with the German Marshall Fund, said Tuesday that while concerns about growing Chinese and Russian Arctic activity are very real, they are best served under the current arrangement, which respects the sovereignty of a key NATO ally, as well as the expressed will of the people of Greenland.
“The recent U.S. policy on Greenland has been quite counterproductive, as far as we can see,” Arts said.
Danish officials expressed hope that a planned high-level working group between the United States, Denmark, and Greenland will de-escalate tensions.
Read the full article here
18 Comments
The mention of growing Chinese and Russian Arctic activity is a significant factor in this situation, and I think it’s essential to consider their interests and potential responses to the increased NATO presence.
It’s interesting that Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund points out that while the US could easily stage a military takeover of Greenland, actually running it would be much more difficult, especially without European support.
The overall situation in Greenland is complex and multifaceted, involving strategic, environmental, and diplomatic considerations, and I think it’s essential to approach it with a nuanced and cooperative mindset.
The participation of Germany and France in sending troops to Greenland is a significant development, and I’d like to know more about their specific contributions and roles in the operation.
The fact that President Trump wants to acquire Greenland ‘one way or another’ is quite concerning, especially considering the strategic significance of the island and the potential consequences for NATO participation.
I’m curious to know more about the Danish exercise Operation Arctic Endurance and how the Swedish Armed Forces will contribute to it, as mentioned by Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson.
The fact that the meeting between officials from Greenland, Denmark, and the US did not succeed in changing the American position on possible annexation is a significant development, and I wonder what the next steps will be in this process.
I’m concerned about the potential environmental impact of increased military activity in the Arctic region and wonder if the nations involved have considered this in their planning.
That’s a valid concern, but perhaps the benefits of increased security and cooperation outweigh the potential environmental costs.
It’s surprising that the US is pushing for the acquisition of Greenland despite the potential challenges and costs, as highlighted by Ian Lesser’s comments on infrastructure and running the island.
The fact that all these nations participated in the Arctic Light military exercise last September suggests a high level of cooperation and coordination among European allies.
The fact that Norway’s prime minister has made a statement of support for the effort suggests a high level of regional cooperation and commitment to security in the Arctic.
I’m skeptical about the UK’s willingness to join the effort, as reported by Le Monde, and I wonder what their motivations are for potentially sending troops to Greenland.
Maybe the UK is trying to strengthen its ties with NATO and demonstrate its commitment to regional security.
The statement by Danish Minister of Defense Troels Lund Poulsen that ‘security tensions have spread to the Arctic’ highlights the growing importance of the region and the need for increased military presence.
The mention of existing international agreements that could allow the US to increase its military capability in Greenland is an important aspect of this situation, and I wonder how these agreements might be utilized.
I’m curious to know more about the specific military capabilities that will be contributed by each nation, such as ships, planes, and soldiers, as mentioned by Danish military officials.
The role of the Danish government in requesting Swedish personnel from the Armed Forces to participate in Operation Arctic Endurance is a key aspect of this story, and I’d like to know more about their decision-making process.