It would be interesting to see a comparison of the.40’s performance in different shooting sports, such as IDPA or IPSC, to see if its popularity has indeed waned in these communities.
The video’s title suggests a sense of controversy, so I’m expecting a lively debate in the comments section about the.40’s merits and whether it’s truly dead.
The title ‘Is the.40 Really Dead?’ implies a sense of finality, but I think it’s more likely that the.40 is just evolving to meet changing user needs, rather than becoming obsolete entirely.
I’m not sure what to make of the claim that the.40 is dead, since I’ve seen plenty of.40 caliber guns for sale at my local gun store, and they seem to be popular among some shooters.
I’ve heard rumors that the.40 is being phased out by some law enforcement agencies, but I’d like to see actual statistics on this trend before making any conclusions.
As someone who’s shot both.40 and 9mm, I can attest that the.40 has a unique recoil that some shooters prefer, so I’m skeptical that it’s completely dead.
If the.40 is indeed dead, I wonder what this means for the future of guns chambered in this caliber, and whether they’ll become collectibles or be phased out entirely.
I’ve noticed that some popular firearms YouTubers have discussed the.40’s potential decline, but it’s hard to say whether this is just a trend or a lasting shift in the industry.
The video on YouTube probably touches on the role of firearms manufacturers in the potential demise of the.40, and whether they’re still producing.40 caliber guns at the same rate.
The.40’s reputation for being a compromise between the 9mm and.45 has likely contributed to its perceived decline, as some shooters may view it as not exceling in either category.
As a relatively new shooter, I’m curious to learn more about the history of the.40 and how it became popular in the first place, to better understand its potential decline.
It’s possible that the.40’s decline is more of a marketing issue, rather than a reflection of its actual performance, and that it simply needs to be rebranded or repositioned in the market.
Since the full video is on YouTube, I’m curious to know what specific points are discussed about the.40 being dead, and what evidence is presented to support this claim.
16 Comments
It would be interesting to see a comparison of the.40’s performance in different shooting sports, such as IDPA or IPSC, to see if its popularity has indeed waned in these communities.
The video’s title suggests a sense of controversy, so I’m expecting a lively debate in the comments section about the.40’s merits and whether it’s truly dead.
The title ‘Is the.40 Really Dead?’ implies a sense of finality, but I think it’s more likely that the.40 is just evolving to meet changing user needs, rather than becoming obsolete entirely.
I’m not sure what to make of the claim that the.40 is dead, since I’ve seen plenty of.40 caliber guns for sale at my local gun store, and they seem to be popular among some shooters.
I’ve heard rumors that the.40 is being phased out by some law enforcement agencies, but I’d like to see actual statistics on this trend before making any conclusions.
As someone who’s shot both.40 and 9mm, I can attest that the.40 has a unique recoil that some shooters prefer, so I’m skeptical that it’s completely dead.
That’s a good point about recoil, but some argue that the 9mm has improved to the point where the.40’s advantages are no longer significant.
If the.40 is indeed dead, I wonder what this means for the future of guns chambered in this caliber, and whether they’ll become collectibles or be phased out entirely.
I’ve noticed that some popular firearms YouTubers have discussed the.40’s potential decline, but it’s hard to say whether this is just a trend or a lasting shift in the industry.
The video on YouTube probably touches on the role of firearms manufacturers in the potential demise of the.40, and whether they’re still producing.40 caliber guns at the same rate.
The.40’s reputation for being a compromise between the 9mm and.45 has likely contributed to its perceived decline, as some shooters may view it as not exceling in either category.
That’s a valid point, but others might argue that the.40’s balance of power and capacity makes it an attractive option for self-defense.
As a relatively new shooter, I’m curious to learn more about the history of the.40 and how it became popular in the first place, to better understand its potential decline.
It’s possible that the.40’s decline is more of a marketing issue, rather than a reflection of its actual performance, and that it simply needs to be rebranded or repositioned in the market.
Since the full video is on YouTube, I’m curious to know what specific points are discussed about the.40 being dead, and what evidence is presented to support this claim.
The video likely explores the decline in popularity of the.40 caliber and its potential replacement by other calibers.