Listen to the article

0:00
0:00

The extra $250 a month never covered much. Not the higher utility bills when one parent was home alone managing everything. Not the emergency child care when deployment orders came through. Not the gas money for those late-night drives to care for a sick child when your spouse is 7,000 miles away.

The monthly payment, called Family Separation Allowance, hasn’t changed since 2002. 

Twenty-three years of inflation later, military families are about to receive their first raise. Advocates say it’s long overdue, but it’s smaller than Congress authorized.

The fiscal 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, signed Oct. 18 by President Donald Trump, bumps the payment from $250 to $300 per month. That’s a 20% increase for service members involuntarily separated from their families for 30 days or more due to deployments, sea duty or other assignments.

The Pentagon Already Had Authority to Go Higher

Here’s the frustrating part. Congress authorized the Pentagon to raise the allowance to $400 a month in the fiscal 2024 defense bill two years ago. The department just never did it. Defense officials called the 2024 increase “discretionary” and said they needed more time to study military compensation. Meanwhile, military families kept getting $250 a month while everything else got more expensive.

“It has been 20 years since the last increase of the Family Separation Allowance. It’s time to bring it in line with the current cost of living,” Kelly Hruska, government relations director for the National Military Family Association, told Military Times in January 2024. “This is what Congress intended.”

Rep. Tony Gonzales, the Texas Republican who pushed for the original increase, wasn’t happy either. “Our military families make great sacrifices every day,” he said. “I will continue to work with the Department of Defense to ensure this boost is made a reality.” That was in January 2024. He’s still waiting.

Why $50 More Actually Matters

The payment kicks in when service members are separated from their dependents for at least 30 consecutive days. That includes deployments, unaccompanied tours in places such as Korea, and sea duty for sailors.

The money is tax-free and comes on top of other pay and allowances. It’s meant to help cover the extra costs that hit when one parent is managing everything alone: paying someone to mow the lawn, emergency babysitters, the higher electricity bill from leaving lights on for security, the cost of video calls to stay connected.

In 2002, $250 covered more of those costs. Today it covers less, and the gap keeps growing. The $300 monthly rate in the new bill helps, but it’s still $100 short of what Congress said would be appropriate two years ago.

For a six-month deployment, the increase means an extra $300 over the entire separation. That’s real money for military families, many of whom already struggle with housing costs and food insecurity. But it doesn’t make up for two decades of frozen payments.

Part of a Broader Push

The family separation increase sits among other quality-of-life improvements in the $900.6 billion defense bill. Service members are getting a 3.8% pay raise across the board. The bill also requires a study on improving how the military calculates housing allowances to keep up with rising rental costs.

Read More: Trump Signs into Law the 2026 Military Pay Raise. Here’s How Much You’ll Get.

For families dealing with a deployment right now, the new Family Separation Allowance rate should show up in January’s paychecks.

Is $300 a month enough? Probably not. But it’s better than waiting another 20 years for the Pentagon to decide whether military families deserve a cost-of-living adjustment. 

Stay on Top of Your Veteran Benefits

Military benefits are always changing. Keep up with everything from pay to health care by subscribing to Military.com, and get access to up-to-date pay charts and more with all latest benefits delivered straight to your inbox.

Story Continues

Read the full article here

Share.

16 Comments

  1. The article raises important questions about the Department of Defense’s priorities and commitment to supporting military families, particularly in light of the frozen allowance for two decades.

  2. The fact that the payment kicks in after 30 consecutive days of separation and is tax-free is a positive aspect, but the amount still falls short of what’s needed to cover the extra costs of deployments.

  3. Isabella Thomas on

    It’s disappointing that the increase is not retroactive, considering that military families have been struggling with the frozen payment for years.

  4. The increase in the Family Separation Allowance is part of a broader push to support military families, but more needs to be done to address the systemic issues that affect their well-being.

  5. Patricia Lopez on

    I’m curious to know how the Department of Defense plans to ensure that the increased allowance is effectively used to support military families, rather than just being absorbed into the overall budget.

  6. The $50 increase may seem small, but for military families who struggle with housing costs and food insecurity, the extra $300 over a six-month deployment can make a significant difference.

  7. James Rodriguez on

    The 20% increase in the Family Separation Allowance from $250 to $300 per month is a step in the right direction, but it’s disappointing that it’s still $100 short of the $400 that Congress authorized two years ago.

  8. Olivia W. Garcia on

    I’m skeptical about the Pentagon’s claim that they needed more time to study military compensation, considering the allowance hasn’t changed since 2002 and inflation has significantly eroded its value.

  9. Isabella Lopez on

    The National Military Family Association’s advocacy for an increase in the Family Separation Allowance is crucial, as it highlights the need to bring the allowance in line with the current cost of living.

  10. Jennifer White on

    Rep. Tony Gonzales’ efforts to push for the original increase are commendable, and it’s disappointing that the Department of Defense didn’t follow through on the authorized increase to $400 per month.

  11. Elizabeth Miller on

    The fact that the new rate of $300 per month is still not enough to cover the extra costs of deployments, such as higher utility bills and emergency child care, is a concern that needs to be addressed.

  12. Patricia Taylor on

    It’s surprising that the Pentagon had the authority to raise the allowance to $400 per month two years ago, but chose not to, citing the need for further study.

  13. The quote from Kelly Hruska, government relations director for the National Military Family Association, highlights the urgency of the issue and the need for the Department of Defense to take action.

  14. The article mentions that the $250 allowance hasn’t changed since 2002, which is shocking considering the significant increase in cost of living over the past two decades.

Leave A Reply

© 2025 Gun Range Day. All Rights Reserved.