Listen to the article
Surplus kits, like this vz. 58 kit from Century Arms, are a DIY way to get hard-to-find models while learning about how these firearms operate.
The components that make up a ārifle kitā have evolved over time. For several decades, the term chiefly referred to a complete set of parts for a traditionally styled, blackpowder rifle that needed minor fitting, surface finishing and assembly. The rifle kits of recent years, whether comprised of surplus parts or all-new components, are far different animals. Popular modern sporting rifle platforms and legal-to-own versions of legacy battle rifles figure heavily into the kit world today.
When comprised of used components taken from demilitarized (or ādemilledā) service arms, parts kits typically require replacement of several components. The unusable parts, such as cut-up receivers and (sometimes) barrels, may have been intentionally destroyed to bring the kit into compliance with current U.S. laws, or they may simply be missing. Legal replacements may be provided by the supplier or required to be furnished by the buyer/builder.
Other kits contain completely new parts, either as stripped components or partially built rifles, with some assembly still required. Most AR- and many AK-pattern rifle kits fall into the new-parts category. Regardless of kit type, each of the modern DIY-rifle styles fits a wide range of needs, including home defense, hunting and tactical training.
A quick search for ādemilled rifle parts kitsā will yield a large number of mid- and late-20th-century battle-rifle options. Many surplus kits require gunsmithing skills and, due to specific parts which may be included, necessitate familiarity with federal and state laws. For example, several battle-rifle parts kits include original, full-automatic trigger groups. While semi-automatic receivers are designed to prevent installation and use of these triggers, modifying either component to work together violates the National Firearms Act, which carries hefty legal consequences.
Youāll also find kits with short barrels permanently pinned and welded to be at least 16 inches long or used for large-format-pistol or registered short-barrel-rifle builds. The current (2009) edition of Publication 5320.8, the āNational Firearms Act Handbook,ā is available for download from the ATFās website (atf.gov) and can be a useful resource. While not fully inclusive, this publication shines a fair amount of light on many of the common prohibited components and configurations. When in doubt, contact the ATFās NFA Branch for clarification or a Class II SOT (manufacturer of NFA firearms) for hands-on help.
When a receiver is required to complete a build kit, the simplest option is to purchase it from an FFLācomplete with all appropriate background checks and an ATF Form 4473. However, current federal laws do not prevent an individual from manufacturing a receiver for personal use, should they have that ability. Nonetheless, the rules vary from state to state, so itās important to understand your local laws as well.
This is especially important in light of the Department of Justiceās (DOJās) April, 2022, regulation updates to the definitions of and marking requirements for firearm frames and receivers. Despite lower court rulings that prevented enforcement of this reclassification effort, SCOTUS upheld DOJās position in 2025, leaving in place a confusing and convoluted web of rules that risks tripping up unwary and otherwise innocent gun owners and FFLs.
As a licensed manufacturer of both NFA and regular firearms, I have to stay abreast of and fully familiar with all relevant regulations. Still, the so-called āFrame or Receiver Ruleā is packed with so much ambiguity that Iām forced to turn away certain types of work just to be on the safe side. That costs me potential customers, but dancing around gray areas is unwise in this industry. My advice to anyone considering a receiver-less rifle kit is to purchase an already-serialized and marked receiver from a licensed dealer.
Finding a rifle parts kit that costs less than a bottom-tier rifle of the same model isnāt too challenging. Thus, a careful shopper with the tools and ability to correctly assemble parts can land a bargain. The builder also gets the satisfaction of helping to create (or recreate) a functional tool. The nostalgia factor for out-of-production or otherwise non-importable firearms is another positive.
Iāve had the opportunity to service and test a fair number of rifles built from parts kits in recent years. In some cases, the builder simply wanted a second set of eyes and proper tooling (if needed) to remedy anything that may have been out of whack. Other customers had concerns about partsā conditions or quality. On the AR side of the house, parts kits have been good enough to allow for functional rifles that were well-suited to general-purpose use. Where new components had to be replaced or modified, they were limited to small parts with fit or finish problems. The major components did what they were supposed to do, even if they werenāt top-tier.
Rifles built from demilled surplus parts kits have needed more attention. In some cases, major component replacements were required. With the parent rifles having endured all the rigors of military service, heavily worn finishes or corroded parts arenāt uncommon. Moderate-to-significant wear of the chamber, bore and moving parts may also be encountered. Pay close attention to pictures, descriptions and return policies before ordering. Since headspace and other critical dimensions and components should be checked prior to use, itās worth letting a gunsmith check your finished masterpiece to ensure itās safe.
As plentiful as they may seem now, surplus military-rifle-parts kits will not last forever. I grew up in the era when semi-auto versions of just about every mid-20th-century fighting rifle could be had at fractions of todayās prices. My shooting buddies and I wagered that theyād still be around when we finally saved enough money to buy our favorites, but politics and the laws of supply and demand had something to say about that.
If we were to go strictly by the number of options on the market, we could conclude that the age of the kit rifle is at hand. Considering that December is when most of us gather with family and friends to count blessings and exchange gifts, itās worth considering the multitude of affordable rifle kits that are waiting to be born or simply remade into new images of their old selves. Just sayinā.
Read the full article here

18 Comments
I’m curious about the process of manufacturing a receiver for personal use, as the article mentions that current federal laws do not prevent an individual from doing so, but the rules vary from state to state.
The article highlights the importance of understanding the laws and regulations surrounding the build process, including the need for background checks and compliance with the National Firearms Act, which is crucial for avoiding legal consequences.
The article’s mention of the need for a background check and ATF Form 4473 when purchasing a receiver from an FFL is an important reminder of the legal requirements involved in building a rifle from a kit.
The fact that many surplus kits require gunsmithing skills and familiarity with federal and state laws is a concern, as it may be challenging for beginners to navigate these complexities.
The fact that the rules for manufacturing a receiver for personal use vary from state to state is a concern, as it highlights the need for careful research and planning to ensure compliance with federal and state laws.
It’s also important to note that some states have more restrictive laws than others, so it’s essential to understand the specific laws in your state before attempting to build a rifle from a kit.
I’m skeptical about the idea of building a rifle from a kit, especially with the legal complexities involved, such as the National Firearms Act and the need for background checks and ATF Form 4473.
The article mentions that surplus kits, like the vz. 58 kit from Century Arms, are a DIY way to get hard-to-find models while learning about how these firearms operate, which I find really interesting as it provides an opportunity for hands-on learning.
I appreciate the article’s mention of the importance of contacting the ATF’s NFA Branch for clarification or seeking hands-on help from a Class II SOT when in doubt about the build process or compliance with federal laws.
I appreciate the article’s discussion of the different options available for building a rifle from a kit, including the use of surplus components and new parts, which can help to reduce costs and increase customization options.
The fact that some kits include original, full-automatic trigger groups, which cannot be used with semi-automatic receivers, is a concern, as it highlights the complexity of the build process and the need for careful planning and research.
The article’s discussion of the different types of kits available, including those with new parts and those with surplus components, is helpful in understanding the options available to those looking to build a rifle from a kit.
I’ve built a rifle from a kit before and can attest to the fact that it requires a lot of patience and attention to detail, especially when it comes to ensuring that all components are properly installed and functioning correctly.
The article mentions that a quick search for ‘demilled rifle parts kits’ will yield a large number of mid- and late-20th-century battle-rifle options, which is a great resource for those looking to build a unique rifle.
The mention of the National Firearms Act Handbook, available for download from the ATF’s website, is a useful resource for those looking to build a rifle from a kit and wanting to ensure they are in compliance with federal laws.
I’m excited about the possibility of building a rifle from a kit, as it provides an opportunity to learn about the inner workings of firearms and create a customized rifle that meets my specific needs.
I’ve heard that some kits contain completely new parts, either as stripped components or partially built rifles, which can be a good option for those who want to build a rifle without having to start from scratch.
I’m concerned about the potential risks involved in building a rifle from a kit, including the risk of non-compliance with federal laws and the potential for accidents or injuries if the rifle is not properly assembled.