It would be helpful if there was a brief description or at least a few keywords about what the video covers to pique the interest of potential viewers.
This format seems to rely heavily on the existing popularity of the Sunday Shoot-a-Round series, which might not be effective for attracting new viewers.
The content preview simply stating ‘Watch full video on YouTube’ comes across as somewhat lazy in terms of providing actual content or enticing readers.
The fact that it’s categorized under ‘Videos’ suggests the article is more about promoting the video content rather than providing written information.
It seems like the main call to action is to watch the full video on YouTube, which might not be appealing to readers looking for a quick summary or overview.
I’m surprised the video on YouTube is not embedded directly into the article, making it harder for viewers to access the content without leaving the page.
18 Comments
The title Sunday Shoot-a-Round #303 implies it’s part of a series, I wonder what the main topic of discussion is in this particular episode.
I’m skeptical about the engagement this article will receive without providing any substantial information or teaser about the video’s content.
For new viewers, not having any prior knowledge or context about the series might make it less appealing to watch this particular episode.
Without any tags or specific details, it’s challenging to understand the focus or main theme of the video content.
It would be helpful if there was a brief description or at least a few keywords about what the video covers to pique the interest of potential viewers.
Perhaps the target audience is already familiar with the Sunday Shoot-a-Round series and doesn’t need an introduction or summary.
The decision to host the video on YouTube instead of the article page itself could be due to bandwidth or storage concerns.
That’s a valid point, hosting videos can be costly and YouTube provides a free alternative.
This format seems to rely heavily on the existing popularity of the Sunday Shoot-a-Round series, which might not be effective for attracting new viewers.
Unless they’re using this as a strategy to drive traffic to their YouTube channel, which could be a viable marketing tactic.
The content preview simply stating ‘Watch full video on YouTube’ comes across as somewhat lazy in terms of providing actual content or enticing readers.
I’ve been following these Sunday Shoot-a-Round videos for a while, and I’m curious to see how this episode differs from the previous ones.
Not having an excerpt or any details about the content of the video makes it difficult to decide whether to watch it or not.
Given the lack of information about the video content, I hope the YouTube video provides a clear and concise summary of what to expect.
The fact that it’s categorized under ‘Videos’ suggests the article is more about promoting the video content rather than providing written information.
It seems like the main call to action is to watch the full video on YouTube, which might not be appealing to readers looking for a quick summary or overview.
Without more context or details, it’s difficult to provide meaningful feedback or engage with the content on a deeper level.
I’m surprised the video on YouTube is not embedded directly into the article, making it harder for viewers to access the content without leaving the page.