Listen to the article
0:00
0:00
Watch full video on YouTube
Testing the RM338: The 50 CAL Replacement with Unbelievably Light Recoil
Watch full video on YouTube
12 Comments
I’ve been following the development of the RM338 and I’m impressed by its potential, but I’d like to see more data on its reliability and durability before making any conclusions.
It’s about time someone developed a 50 CAL replacement with lighter recoil – the RM338 could be a real breakthrough for the shooting community.
As a hunter, I’m always looking for ways to improve my shooting experience – the RM338’s lighter recoil could make a big difference for me, especially on longer shoots.
The YouTube video preview didn’t show much of the RM338’s design, I’m curious to know more about its features and how they contribute to the reduced recoil.
From what I’ve seen, the RM338 has a redesigned muzzle brake that helps reduce recoil, but I’d like to know more about the materials used in its construction.
The RM338’s potential to replace the 50 CAL is huge, but I think we need to see more testing and evaluation before we can say for sure if it’s a viable alternative.
The fact that the RM338 is being considered as a 50 CAL replacement is exciting, I’d love to see more testing and evaluation of its performance in different scenarios.
The RM338’s unbelievably light recoil is a game-changer, I’m curious to know how it compares to other 50 CAL replacements in terms of accuracy and range.
I’ve heard the RM338 has a shorter barrel, which might affect its range, but the reduced recoil is a huge advantage for shooters.
As someone who’s shot the 50 CAL before, I’m intrigued by the idea of a replacement with lighter recoil – it could make a big difference for shooters who struggle with the kick.
I’m skeptical about the claim of ‘unbelievably light recoil’ – has anyone done a side-by-side comparison with other 50 CAL replacements to verify this?
I’m concerned that the RM338 might not have the same level of stopping power as the 50 CAL, has anyone done any testing to compare their effectiveness?