Listen to the article
Federal agencies and private groups are keeping their eyes peeled for hacking and information-warfare efforts launched in response to the wake of the United States’ Jan. 3 attack on Venezuela to capture leader Nicolás Maduro. The unilateral attack has raised concerns that countries aligned with Venezuela, such as China or Russia, may launch retaliatory cyberattacks on U.S. soil.
The situation requires “heightened vigilance,” said Madhu Gottumukkala, acting director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, in a statement.
“While CISA has not identified a specific threat at this time, we remain steadfast in monitoring for any indicators of malicious activity and are working shoulder-to-shoulder with our government and industry partners to defend against today’s risks and strengthen resilience for the future,” Gottumukkala said.
Last year, CISA removed many employees who tracked false information online, part of a broader effort launched under Trump 2.0 to rework the agency after GOP figures made unsubstantiated and disputed accusations that the cyber agency had used its counter-disinformation resources to censor Americans’ free speech.
Since the raid, regional experts have seen a rise in synthetic and inaccurate content. Adrián González, co-founder of the Venezuela-based nonprofit news and messaging monitor Cazadores de Fake News, said that much of the content generated by AI tools is coming from users in Venezuela and other Latin American countries, as opposed to larger U.S. adversaries.
“There has been a wave of hoaxes created with AI, there is a lot of synthetic content on social media,” González said in an interview. “But it is spontaneous: it is content generated by the same users, which confuses a lot of other users.”
He said the authors of this content are not linked to any foreign campaigns, despite previous documented coordination between Venezuela and Russia to amplify their individual preferred narratives.
“These videos are generated in a spontaneous way and are not coordinated by a large number of users,” he said. “They don’t form part of coordinated disinformation operations.”
Some of the most viral AI-created images have purported to portray Maduro in prison, content which Cazadores de Fake News and others have worked to discredit.
They are “creating images of Maduro detained that don’t exist, creating videos of Maduro dancing, uniformed in jail, or of the destruction of military or iconic installations of Chavismo that, in reality, were never destroyed,” said González.
Chavismo is a left-wing populist political movement in Venezuela named after the nation’s founder, former president Hugo Chávez, and associated with Maduro.
There has also been an increase in website domain registrations around Maduro, Donald Trump, and other high-profile figures related to the Venezuela operation, said Rishika Desai, a threat researcher with BforeAI, a firm that uses predictive AI tools to identify and stop cyber threats.
“We identified over 140 domains in various stages of preparation in the past three days, referencing alleged ‘releases’ or sites claiming as his [Maduro’s] official narrative,” Desai said.
The firm also tracked the registration of more than 460 new domains on themes such as Nobel Peace Prize claims and petition-based campaigns against political figures, she said.
She said the team “also noted the emergence of coin-branded narratives, including so-called ‘Venezuelan libre’ tokens and ‘Crypto Maduro,’ which are commonly used for fraudulent investments and pump-and-dump schemes.”
Venezuela is no stranger to information warfare, with its government having spent years promoting state-aligned narratives through official media and online supporters. Those efforts have typically lacked the scale, sophistication and global reach seen with more robust influence operations from nations like Russia and China.
Read the full article here

15 Comments
I’m concerned that the current situation could lead to a further escalation of tensions between the US and countries like China and Russia, and it’s crucial that diplomats and policymakers are working to de-escalate the situation and prevent a wider conflict.
That’s a valid concern, but it’s also important to recognize that the US and other countries have a responsibility to protect their interests and prevent the spread of misinformation and disinformation.
Madhu Gottumukkala’s statement about the need for heightened vigilance is spot on, given the current situation, and it’s reassuring to know that CISA is working with government and industry partners to defend against potential threats.
It’s concerning that some of the most viral AI-created images have purported to portray Maduro in prison, and it’s essential that organizations like Cazadores de Fake News continue to work to discredit such content and prevent the spread of misinformation.
The increase in website domain registrations around Maduro, Donald Trump, and other high-profile figures related to the Venezuela operation is a red flag, and I appreciate Rishika Desai’s work in identifying potential cyber threats using predictive AI tools.
I’m curious to know more about the broader effort launched under Trump 2.0 to rework CISA, and how the removal of employees who tracked false information online will impact the agency’s ability to counter disinformation campaigns.
The US attack on Venezuela has significant implications for regional stability, and it’s essential that the international community is prepared to respond to potential cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns that could exacerbate the situation.
It’s heartening to see that organizations like Cazadores de Fake News are working to combat misinformation and promote media literacy, and I hope that their efforts will help to mitigate the impact of AI-generated hoaxes and other forms of disinformation.
I’m skeptical about the claim that the authors of AI-generated content are not linked to any foreign campaigns, despite previous documented coordination between Venezuela and Russia to amplify their individual preferred narratives.
That’s a fair point, but it’s also possible that the current wave of hoaxes is indeed spontaneous and not coordinated by a large number of users, as Adrián González suggests.
The unilateral US attack on Venezuela to capture leader Nicolás Maduro has raised concerns about potential retaliatory cyberattacks from countries like China or Russia, and it’s crucial that federal agencies and private groups are monitoring the situation closely.
I’m interested in learning more about the types of cyber threats that BforeAI is identifying and stopping, and how their predictive AI tools are being used to prevent the spread of misinformation and protect against potential attacks.
The use of AI tools to generate synthetic content is a relatively new phenomenon, and it’s essential that researchers and policymakers are working to understand the implications of this technology and develop strategies to combat its potential misuse.
The rise in synthetic and inaccurate content, particularly AI-generated hoaxes, is alarming, and it’s interesting that Adrián González notes that much of this content is coming from users in Venezuela and other Latin American countries rather than larger US adversaries.
The fact that CISA has not identified a specific threat at this time is reassuring, but it’s also important to recognize that the situation is fluid and could change rapidly, requiring continued vigilance from federal agencies and private groups.