Listen to the article
0:00
0:00
Watch full video on YouTube
Your Gun Training Is Useless Past 10 Yards?
Watch full video on YouTube
22 Comments
The emphasis on close-quarters combat in traditional gun training may be misplaced, and it’s time to rethink our approach.
I’ve received training that focuses on shooting at distances up to 25 yards, so I’m not sure I agree with the article’s claim.
It’s not just about the distance, but also the environment and the shooter’s ability to adapt to different situations.
I’ve heard that the average self-defense shooting occurs at a distance of around 3-5 yards, which makes me wonder if the 10-yard mark is even relevant.
That’s true, but what about situations where the attacker is trying to get away or is at a distance, don’t we need to be prepared for those scenarios as well?
It would be interesting to see a comparison of different gun training programs and their effectiveness at various distances.
The video’s message is clear: traditional gun training is not enough, and we need to be pushing the boundaries of what’s possible.
The article’s claim has sparked an important conversation about the effectiveness of gun training, and I hope it leads to some meaningful changes.
I’m skeptical about the notion that traditional gun training is ineffective at longer ranges, has anyone considered the role of technology in improving accuracy?
The 10-yard mark seems arbitrary, what specific factors contribute to the supposed ineffectiveness of gun training at longer ranges?
I’m curious to know more about the specific training methods that are being criticized, and what alternatives are being proposed.
Perhaps the focus should be on developing training programs that prioritize versatility and adaptability, rather than just close-quarters combat.
That’s a great point, and it’s something that many modern training programs are already incorporating.
The idea that gun training is useless past 10 yards has significant implications for law enforcement and military training, I’d like to see a more in-depth analysis.
The idea that gun training is useless past 10 yards is a bold claim, I’d like to see some statistics or studies to back this up.
Actually, there are several studies that suggest the majority of self-defense shootings occur within 10 feet, which supports this claim.
As a gun owner, I’m concerned about the potential limitations of my training, and I hope there are resources available to help me improve my skills at longer ranges.
The video’s assertion that most gun training is useless past 10 yards highlights the need for more advanced and specialized training programs.
The article’s claim that traditional gun training is ineffective at longer ranges makes me question the value of my own training, I hope there’s more to the story.
The article highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to gun training, one that takes into account the complexities of real-world scenarios.
I’ve seen videos of shooters hitting targets at 50 yards with ease, so I’m not convinced that gun training is useless past 10 yards.
As someone who has received gun training, I can attest that the focus is often on close-quarters combat, but what about scenarios where the attacker is at a distance?